Blog contributors & followers
Oct. 19 presentation by Susanne Moser, director and principal researcher, Susanne Moser Research and Consulting:
We’re working on getting some of the presentations from Sea Grant Week 2010 ready to add to this blog. Meanwhile, enjoy a gallery of photos from New Orleans:
(Thanks to photographers Kurt Byers, Jim Hiney, Dianne Lindstedt, Chelsea Lowes, Peg Van Patten and Jim Wilkins for sharing their photos with us. If you have photos you’d like to see added to the gallery – or if you see something that’s misattributed – contact Pat Kight).
… and thanks to the team of communicators, educators and legal program staff who helped cover Sea Grant Week. (Their names are at the bottom right of the page).
We’ll be adding more material over the next week.
Sea Grant Week wrapped up Wednesday morning with a quick review of discussions at the four Focus Area breakout sessions the afternoon before. Groups had been asked to consider:
- Where we are heading
- What is Sea Grant’s “niche” in this topic and how can we develop strategies for funding and collaboration?
- Ideas for future National Strategic initiatives
- What are we missing?
Their reports, briefly:
Sustainable Coastal Development
- Need better coordination to avoid duplication, form partnerships
- Social sciences are our niche; however proposals can be hard to move because of lack of reviewers.
- Build a national SG panel of qualified social science reviewers?
- Need a centralized communication strategy for advancing the agenda of the focus areas
Safe and Sustainable Seafood
- Heading toward regionalization, integration across focus centers, professionalizing the seafood/fishing industry with training and coursework
- Our niche: As the engagement arm of Sea Grant
- NSI ideas: “greening” of the industry
- Missing: Impacts. Need clear examples and guidance. Decouple impact reporting from the annual report; impacts should be reported over time, not on an annual basis
- How can the national office best handle and make use of all the reporting data? How do we know what’s been reported?
- Focus teams need to communicate with the network (and NOAA, and constituents) – and vice versa.
Healthy Coastal Ecosystems
- Programs need more information about the roles and activities of focus groups.
- Review focus team membership so all programs and networks are represented; maybe outside partners and funders, too.
- There’s no need for new teams, but we could improve integration across teams.
- NSI ideas: Evaluation of long-term restoration efforts
- Value and evaluation of restoration and ecosystem function work
- Environmental literacy
- If we are aligned well with the NOAA plan, we need to communicate that
- Better communication between focus teams and network
- National impact statements do not always communicate the whole of the network’s effort
- SG needs to take focus groups to a higher level and better integrate them with programs. Teams should serve as “think tanks” for give and take
- Perhaps we should map our strategic plan to NOAA’s.
- Sea Grant is moving beyond flood insurance as a resilience technique
- Need more emphasis of integrating social science into physical science “to see the whole picture.”
- Niche: Working with community “movers and shakers” – need better approaches to educating them.
- We need better predisaster planning and stronger response liaisons.
- NSI: how to predict, prepare for, mitigate and adapt to hazard vulnerability” on a local scale
- No need for a separate climate focus team, but climate change needs to be better integrated into all teams.
- We need a better idea of SG climate activities, goals and priorities
- A standing working group with people from other focus areas and funding for meetings would facilitate this.
- SG needs to focus on climate variability as well as change; it helps engage stakeholders because they understand variability regardless of their positions on longterm change.
- Need to improve our visibility and connections with vulnerable communities.
- We’re uniquely qualified to help NOAA meet its goal of a climate-literate public.
- Not every program is represented on every focus team; people could become more interested as the teams become more critical to what we do
- Need a means of communicating team activities to the network to keep people engaged
- There’s a lack of understanding of the teams’ roles and relationship to NOAA.
- Energy is an outlier. some programs are engaged in the topic but we aren’t sure where our niche is. Perhaps it fits in sustainable communities.
- Topic is not ripe for an NSI
Larry Robinson, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, NOAA:
Assistant Secretary Robinson kicked off the final morning of Sea Grant Week by challenging the program – and its state programs – to work toward integrating and aligning our efforts more closely with NOAA’s vision of a future of “ecosystems, communities and economies … that are resilient in the face of change.”
In particular, Robinson said, “Sea Grant has played and will continue to play a critical role in connecting NOAA with stakeholders.”
The agency’s new strategic goals (healthy oceans, a weather-ready nation, climate adaptation and mitigation, and resilient communities ecosystems) are all predicated on
- Regional focus
- Environmental education
- Science-based decision-making
“These approaches are all part of Sea Grant’s core mission,” he said.
As an example, Robinson cited the network’s roles in the Deepwater Horizon spill response and recovery. The quick action and connections – including Gulf programs but also Alaska Sea Grant, which was quick to connect Gulf agencies with specialists who’d been through the Exxon Valdez spill – “could only have been accomplished by a network like Sea Grant,” he said.
He urged Sea Grant to join NOAA in forming a “collective vision for the future. How do we get there together?”
Robinson also urged the network and national program to think beyond its traditional roles in marine science planning and policy and “broaden your vision to a global vision.”